The majority of the media has been preoccupied with Rush Limbaugh’s comments about Michael J. Fox’s condition in his recent advertisements for the Missouri and Maryland Senate races, and I, too, agree Limbaugh could have chosen his words better (and eliminated the gestures completely). Though not popular, I do believe it is entirely possible that Fox may have adjusted his medication for effect, as he freely admits in his book, “Lucky Man”. Perhaps I would do the same thing and for the same reason: because “the occasion demanded my testimony about the effects of the disease, and the urgency we as a community were feeling, be seen as well as heard”. But my occasion would not be promoting embryonic stem cell research.
Perusing the blogs, I have found such an emotional response to the Fox ad – and to any comment that even remotely hints that he may have tinkered with his medication. People are so willing to side with their sentiment and lay their sensibilities aside… and that’s just what the ad is meant to do. Make you think? Oh, no! Make you investigate the claims of a victim of Parkinson’s Disease? Heavens, no! Make the citizens of Missouri look up the wording of an amendment to be voted into their constitution? Gee, I sure hope they don’t… :-/
Whether Michael J. Fox took the correct dose of his medication or not is only relevant when you realize his appearance separated viewers from their judgment by playing on their emotions. While my heart goes out to this man and his struggle, we need to vote with our heads, not our hearts. My head tells me that some of the claims he made in the ad are not accurate, but may have been lost on the audience when the appeal was made to their sentimentality. This is why a counter-ad was created soon after the Fox ad was aired:
For those who can’t hear the first line, or can’t understand it: It’s Jim Caviezel, the actor from The Passion of the Christ speaking Aramaic. He says, “Le-bar nash be-neshak,” which translates to mean, “You betray the Son of Man with a kiss,” or “You betray me with a kiss”. The message he is conveying is that Amendment 2 promises one thing, but delivers another.
Aside from the facts Fox left out, in the Maryland ad, he plainly states, “Stem cell research offers hope to millions of Americans with diseases like Diabetes, Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s. But George Bush and Michael Steele would put limits on the most promising stem cell research.” There is no evidence that embryonic stem cell research is the most promising. In fact, adult stem cells have proven more promising, with 72 therapies showing human benefits as opposed to embryonic stem cells showing zero. Recent research also suggests brain tumors may result. Of course, adult stem cells do not require the cloning or killing of human embryos, but only 50% or so of the country cares deeply about that issue.
Politics is increasingly about betrayal and the sting always painful. We factor it in as part of the process and become a little more cynical, I suppose. But I, for one, do not welcome this level of cynicism… I find it hurts even more when betrayed with a kiss.
Posted by NomDebPlume 










Careless Preachers
October 14, 2006“Do not do according to their works; for they say, and do not do.” —Matthew 23:3
Some opponents of Christianity may not be so much against Christ as they are against the hypocrisy of His followers. Ironically, it hasn’t occurred to them that no one was more opposed to hypocrisy than Jesus Himself.
We’ve all met scoffers who thoughtlessly parrot the phrase, “The church is full of hypocrites!” But let’s not be thoughtless in our response and dismiss such pronouncements without taking heed lest they be true.
We tend to think that it’s not true of us. But let’s think again. Have we ever been like the Christian who glanced through her window, only to see a nosy, noisy neighbor approaching her door? Her young, impressionable children heard her as she growled, “Oh, no—not her again!” Whereupon she opened the door and gushed insincerely, “How very nice to see you!”
Our lips and our lives often preach a mixed message. In Matthew 23:1-12, Jesus described the hypocritical teachers of the law and warned His disciples, “Do not do according to their works; for they say, and do not do” (v.3).
God forbid that some opponent of Christ would be influenced by careless hypocrisy in our lives.
Lord, help us to be “careful preachers.” —Joanie Yoder
You can fool the hapless public,
You can be a subtle fraud,
You can hide your little meanness,
But you can’t fool God. —Kleiser
A hypocrite will often pray on his knees on Sunday and prey on his neighbors on Monday.
From “Our Daily Bread”, October 14, 2006
Suggested Reading: Matthew 23:1-12
Why did I include this preachy post today? Because hypocrites, ESPECIALLY in the church, make me crazy. This is not to say that I have not been guilty of the example given above: “Oh, how nice to see you,” when really, it was not at all nice to see my noisy, annoying neighbor (that’s a tough one) – but on a grander scale, what in the world are Christians thinking when they show up for church every Sunday and forget there are 6 other days in the week??
I’m no authority on the subject, my faith is a simple one. I consider Christianity to be a full-time endeavor. I don’t take a “holiday” when I see someone drop a $20.00 bill, for instance… :-/
Let me relate an interesting little story (which I hope to state briefly :-). I was recently hired to help a friend collect a [relatively] large outstanding debt owed to her business. She gave me some background on the gentleman I would be calling: “He is a nice family man, a Christian guy… he even has scripture verses on his business cards” (which is why she was especially surprised he “stiffed” her). After numerous ignored invoices, emails, and phonecalls that were not even answered, I called and spoke politely to the man, even commiserating with him and his predicament. Despite this, he was unbelievably rude and nasty to me, making a point of getting my name and other pertinent information, which he then used to send a cease and desist letter. (Cease and desist after one phonecall? He’s the one who won’t pay… :-/)
Anyway, the point of my story is this guy had no idea who I was or that I knew he was a Christian because he saw me only as a hired independent contractor, not also a friend of the business owner to whom he owes money. SHE knows his public persona, but he didn’t think that *I* did. So he decided to “take a holiday”. That bothered me more than his threatening tone.
I know Christians aren’t perfect and have even been told not to hold them (the ones that irritate me) to a higher standard, but why shouldn’t I? Aren’t we always expecting everyone else to raise their standards? It’s time for hypocrisy to take a holiday - if Christians want to be taken seriously.